logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2013.08.14 2013고단118
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, as the representative of C in Jeonnam-gun, is an employer who runs a fishery products cultivating business by employing three full-time workers.

The Defendant was employed and worked for the above C from March 1, 201 to June 20, 201, and from January 1, 201 to July 31, 2012, and from July 31, 2012, the Defendant did not pay KRW 21,33,334 of wages of retired workers D, as well as KRW 21,33,334 of wages, from January 1, 2012 to May 31, 2012, and did not pay KRW 7,50,000, and KRW 7,500,000 of wages of retired workers E on May 31, 2012, from January 1, 201 to July 31, 2012, who was employed for the above C, and was employed for the period from July 31, 2012 to July 31, 2012 without agreement.

2. Determination is the case falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 109(2) of the same Act.

However, according to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victims can recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant on July 17, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow