logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.07.14 2017고단1776
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim C (the age of 31) are the relationship between the defendant and the victim.

On February 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) expressed that on the road in front of the cafeteria “E” cafeteria located in Daegu Suwon-gu, the Defendant, while she had a dispute with the victim and her female first gets on and out of the taxi, she had the female seated to board the taxi so that the cab door fright at the right side of the female, she would face the female at the right side of the cab; and (b) expressed her female frank “math, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, dar,” and she expressed that “the son and fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, of the son’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. 112 Statement of the department related to the report of the case; and

1. The defendant asserts that the victim's photograph image [the defendant is that the victim is considered to have been completely set on the back of the taxi, the cab door is merely closed, and the cab door was not the intention to get the victim's arms against the victim's arms, and that there was no serious challenge against the victim's face.

In other words, the victim made a statement to the effect that it corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case in this court, and at the time, was a taxi article at the time.

F’s statement in this Court also conforms to the part of the victim’s above statement, ② at the time the defendant seems to have been strongly trying to close the taxi door, and at the time, in light of the location of the defendant and the location of the victim, the defendant appears to have been aware that the victim could face the body of the victim when the victim did not completely board the back seat of the taxi and when the door of the taxi is shut down strongly, and ③ the crime of this case occurred immediately after the victim and the victim were broken down.

arrow