beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
The acquittal portion
1. The Defendant, in the facts charged, is living between the victim C (35 years of age) and the husband and wife, and the Daejeon Middle-gu D apartment 104 Dong 1301.
On August 6, 2014, around 11:30 to 12:00, the Defendant used the Defendant’s arms of the victim, who had a her husband and wife at 104 dong 1301, 1301 of the above apartment complex, and had a boomed the victim’s responsibilities, thereby making it difficult for the victim to take up his responsibilities, thereby making up approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.
2. We examine the judgment, there are statements by the victim, the injury diagnosis report, and the damaged photograph, as evidence that seems to correspond to the above facts charged.
However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record are: (a) The victim may not know whether he had been in the position of the defendant in this court or not; (b) the purpose of the hospital was not to obtain a medical certificate; (c) the hospital did not have received a separate treatment; (d) the hospital did not have received a medical examination; and (e) the hospital stated that it was not to memory that it used the prescribed drug; (b) the victim's body part could have been naturally cured even if it was not treated; (c) the assault committed by the defendant was committed by the victim, who was a male victim with a larger volume than that of the defendant; and (d) it is entirely difficult to accept that the defendant suffered injury, such as a pre-treatment, by taking account of the fact that the defendant's body part of the victim was not treated, it is difficult to readily conclude that the victim suffered an injury by taking into account the defendant's body part of the defendant's body part, including evidence that the victim was in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.
Thus, the above facts charged should be pronounced not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because it is a case where there is no proof of crime, but it is an assault included in the above facts charged.