The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The fact that the defendant, at the time of the instant case, misunderstanding the fact that he had cans and books to the victim at the time of the instant case, did not fit the victim's face.

The injury suffered by the victim is the king or occurred after this case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the basis of the statement and the injury diagnosis report of the victim and witness without credibility was erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. In consideration of the various circumstances on the accused of unfair sentencing, the sentence of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of social service, 80 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the trial court: (i) in the court of the lower court, the victim stated that “the Defendant did not met the Defendant’s own office,” and left part of the body of the Defendant’s statement that “it did not met the Defendant’s appearance,” and left part of the body of the Defendant’s body while taking up the books above the president’s book.” (15 pages of the trial record) and specifically stated the circumstances at the time (2) in the court of the lower court, the witness F, and G, who was at the present site of this case, considered that “the Defendant did not fit the face of the Defendant’s body on the bar cans and cans of the Defendant’s office” (the trial record page 133,145), the victim’s statement was consistent with the witness’s statement and the direction of the Defendant’s statement to the effect that it was not consistent with the witness’s book at the time of the trial.”