logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고단6156
뇌물공여등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, with respect to Defendant A, the same shall apply for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Basic facts are the representative director of the Fund in charge of the manufacture and sale of dismissed materials, who works as a member of the G City Council from July 2014 to the G City Council ( proportional representative). Defendant B, as the president of the LAF, operates the said company together with Defendant A, who is the wife, and H (the indictment of detention on September 23, 2016), was assigned to the member of the G City Council (regional constituency I) around July 2014 and was assigned to the office of the Si Council around September 13, 2016, and was in charge of duties such as proposing bills related to construction and transportation, deliberation on various budgets, petitions, and various civil petitions of local residents, so that it can be reflected in the work by delivering them to G City.

2. Offering a bribe;

A. The G Mayor may secure the financial resources of the Gu in order to reasonably adjust the financial resources between the Si and the autonomous Gu, grant the adjustment grants to the autonomous Gu resulting from financial deficiencies, and the “special adjustment grants” shall be examined and granted by the Mayor in accordance with the application of the head of the Gu when there is a special financial demand which cannot be met by the method of calculating the amount of existing demand, or when there is a special financial demand due to the construction, restoration, repair, etc. of the office buildings and other public facilities of the Gu, or when there is a special financial demand due to other disasters that occurred after the budget is established, or when there is a special financial demand due to the occurrence of disasters

around June 2015, the Defendants were designated as an urban planning area by J 5,157 square meters, which acquired ownership on May 10, 2012 (hereinafter “the instant forest”) to G Siwon H, which had difficulty selling the land because the road was not opened.

As the corporate situation is not good, it was intended to sell the roads so that they can be constructed and use them as corporate funds.

Accordingly, H is in office as a member of the G City Construction Traffic Committee, and budget for the implementation of urban planning projects and the establishment of roads.

arrow