logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.03.12 2012고단705
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is a person engaged in driving agricultural machinery, which is a compact.

On November 14, 2012, the Defendant was moving to the direction of the agricultural road while proceeding with the “inland village” in front of the “inland village” located at the beginning of the high waters of the high waters located in the west-gun of North Korea.

Since there is a lush length, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brake system.

Nevertheless, the part on the right side side side of the said compact, which was driven by the victim B (year 41) who was driving the said farming machine due to the negligence that had been driven by the next to the last place of the accident, was negligent in neglecting this, and the part on the C Freight's upper right side side of the said compact, which was driven by the victim B (year 41).

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim B, such as catum salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the above cargo vehicle owned by the victim (owner)D in excess of 9,460,000 won.

However, the facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. The records of this case reveal that the victim B withdraws his wish to punish the defendant after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided

arrow