All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

The defendant in the factory room is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle BK5.

At around 18:30 on August 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven the said K5 car and proceeded at the speed of about 21-30 kilometers from the front ambanpon to the front ambanpon in the speed of about the speed of about 21-30 kilometers from the front ambanpon to the front ambanpon; (b) caused the Defendant to damage to the victim’s DNA driving (the age of 41) who passed the intersection to the port from the right side of the course by neglecting the duty of front ambling, accurate operation devices, and operation of steering devices, while neglecting the duty of operation of the steering devices at the speed of about 21-30 kilometers at the speed of the front ambanpon; and (c) at the same time, the Defendant damaged the said passenger’s car owned by the victim to the right side of the last ambol.

The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged that he/she expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant after filing the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed under