A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The number of seized small electronic storage bags (No. 1) and 12 plastic bags.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On June 2015, the Defendant received approximately 0.3 g of psychotropic drugs, which were psychotropic drugs, located in a one-time injection vehicle, which was parked in the vicinity of the Seoul C Station, from the Defendant, on a free fluoring clocks (one-time clickphone; hereinafter “philopon”).

2. On August 2015, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03g of philophonephones contained in a single-use diversing machine at the Defendant’s residence located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, by dilutioning them with deep water, and administered them by means of injecting them to his left divers.

3. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant, at around 19:00, administered 0.05g of philophonephones entered in a single-use injection machine, in a way of injecting them into the blood transfusion of his left arms, by dilution with deep water at the same place as paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Investigation report (attaching photographs of seized articles);

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a written confirmation of prescription examination;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Acts on criminal facts, and selection of imprisonment with labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics;

1. Judgment of innocence under the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc.

1. On September 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 15:10 on September 3, 2015, held the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged in a manner that keeps a fluoral phone powder in his/her hand room in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

2. According to the evidence as seen earlier, even though the Defendant was found to have a white dust on his hand, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant was a philophone, it is difficult to view that the Defendant possessed the said philophone, even if it was a philophone, it is difficult to view that the Defendant had the intention to keep it in custody.

Therefore, above.