logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.23 2014고정61
폭행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) on July 30, 2013, on the ground that, while the Defendant was driving on the street around 23:05, the victim C, who is a passenger, in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 190-10-dong, the victim did not properly talk about the destination.

It is the case that assaults the victim due to the blue blusities adjacent to the blusium.

2. On the day of the instant case, the Defendant asserted that on the day of the instant case, the victim got in the taxi and go to the tri apartment apartment in the northwest-dong of Seodaemun-gu, the Defendant merely stated that he was aware of the way to inform him of the way, when the Defendant’s face was taken by drinking himself, and that he was prevented from drinking to defend him, and that there was no time when the victim’s side belbows do not go to the victim.

3. There is a statement in C’s investigative agency and court, the victim as evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case.

The victim initially got an investigation at the investigative agency, and stated that ① the defendant was aboard the taxi in which the defendant was driving and was going to go to the North East East-dong apartment, but the defendant was not erroneous in the course of driving the vehicle due to the error, so that the defendant was going to get off the vehicle and the defendant was to get off the vehicle, and that he did not fit the defendant at his left side with the right blus, and that he was only faced with the defendant, ② in relation to the date and time of assault by the defendant, the defendant made a report to 112 before he was called to the police station, and ③ in relation to the details of the assault committed by the defendant, the defendant was called to be called to the police station, and ③ in relation to the police station, it was asked whether there was a fact that the police officer called to report him to the police station was called to the police station, and that there was no such fact.

However, the victim has reached this court, ① it is true that he first takes the face of the defendant, but the defendant also takes the side of his blue with his arms.

arrow