logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.10.13 2015나5845
물품대금
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a person engaged in the breeding business, such as ducks, using the trade name of "C", and the defendant is a company with the purpose of manufacturing and selling food.

B. On July 12, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant supplied the Plaintiff with the original raw water and feed necessary for raising the original raw water, and the Plaintiff purchased and supplied the original raw water to the Defendant, and entered into an agreement on the entrustment of original raw water (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

C. According to the instant contract, the Plaintiff raised the original and supplied the original to the Defendant, and received commission fees from the Defendant.

1) On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff purchased from the Defendant 12,90 mariths of the original grassland and supplied the Defendant with the original 12,120 mariths on June 13, 2012, and received payment of KRW 12,827,000 for the commission fee. 2) The Plaintiff purchased 15,60 mariths of the original grassland from the Defendant on November 12, 2012, and raised it and received KRW 15,00 for the Defendant on December 24, 2012 and December 26, 2012, and received KRW 11,621,00 for the commission fee.

3) On March 18, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased from the Defendant 15,00 flives of original plants, raised them and supplied original 13,880 flives to the Defendant on April 30, 2013, and received commission fees of KRW 12,432,100. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff was paid flives of KRW 12,432,100, and the purport of the entire arguments and arguments.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant asserts that there were foreign goods, and asserts that there was 1,00,000 won for the supplied goods on June 2012, that the original weight did not meet the standards and that there was spawn originals, and that there was 2,484,000 won for the supplied goods on December 2012, and that there was 3,000,000 won for the supplied goods on April 2013. The Defendant refused to pay 5,080,490 won for the Plaintiff’s business registration, asserting that the Plaintiff did not receive tax benefits.

arrow