1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. Basic facts

A. The Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Promotion Committee for the Establishment of Redevelopment Partnership (Fa name to establish the Promotion Committee for Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project (hereinafter referred to as “tentatively named Promotion Committee”)

From September 28, 2008 to September 2, 2009, the Plaintiff borrowed a total of KRW 35 million from the Plaintiff and repaid only the said principal without interest if the partnership is established. However, in the event of a change of the administrative agency’s policy or an establishment of the promotion committee or the association due to a natural disaster, each loan certificate (No. 1-1-12) under the name of the promotion committee was prepared. Defendant B, who is the chairperson of the promotion committee under title D, E, the vice-chairperson, Defendant C, and adviser, signed each of the positions and names printed on the lower end of each of the above loan certificates. (b) The promotion committee was signed on November 26, 2008 on the future industrial development of the corporation (hereinafter “the future development”).

(b)The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), and the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas.

(3) In order to establish the committee of promoters, the agreement was entered into on March 23, 2012, with the content that the consent form for the establishment of the committee of promoters and the submission of data to obtain the approval form, and the agency agreement was entered into. At the time, the service price to be paid within 14 days after the approval for establishment of the committee of promoters and the designation of the specialized management business entity for rearrangement projects under the Do Government Act was concluded, and the obligation to return the loan lent under the name of the committee of promoters as operating expenses of the committee of promoters, and the obligation to return the future bill was borne by the committee of promoters under the Do Government Act, but the committee of promoters agreed to comprehensively transfer the plan through a separate contract. (c) The establishment of the committee of promoters was approved on March 23, 2012 through the committee of promoters under the Do Government Act based on the Do Government Act.