Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the victim B (the 24 years of age, women) and the relationship between law and the other.

1. Destruction, damage and injury of property;

A. On June 13, 2018, at around 20:40, the Defendant: (a) taken photographs of the victim’s appearance of the Defendant and E together with the victim using a DNA 6 mobile phone owned by the victim; (b) placed the mobile phone on the table; and (c) destroyed the mobile phone monitors by separating and destroying the body of the mobile phone monitors from the D restaurant.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph 1(a) above, walked once on the part of the victim’s left side buckbucks, and went on the victim’s head kbbbbbbbs, and went on the victim’s left side, and went on the victim’s head kbbbbbbs, leading the victim to the left side kbbbb

2. On April 10, 2018, the injured Defendant called the victim and women's problems from the F Building G of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on April 10, 2018, when the victim was able to get out of the victim, the injured Defendant saw the victim's back water at the hand floor in front of the defect in front of the defect in which the victim tried to get out of the facility, carried the victim's back water twice, cut off the drinking water, cut off the back water with the drinking water, etc., and then caused the thrings to undergo medical treatment for 14 days, such as

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 36 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the gist of the facts charged in this part of the dismissal of prosecution of the provisional payment order is as follows: (a) the Defendant confirmed that a female was present in the process of confirming the cell phone from the Defendant’s female problem within the H apartment I of Kimpo-si on the first and last day of October 2017, and without asking the reasons therefor.