Of the facts charged in this case, the prosecution against the assault against the victim C, D, E, F, and G is dismissed.

In this case.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. From 17:00 to 17:30 as of April 2013, the Defendant paid the victim C (13 years of age), D (13 years of age), E (14 years of age), and F (13 years of age) to the end of the I market J located in Hacheon-gu, Sincheon-gu, Y, and committed assault against the victims, respectively, by taking the victims into account their body at one time, and continuously turning the victims into their playgrounds at several times, and continuing to turn the victims into the headal elementary school, which is located in 275-2 of the same Godong-dong 275-2 of the same Gu.

B. On November 11, 2013, around 12:00, the Defendant paid the Victim F (13 years of age) and G (14 years of age) to the Sincheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 275-2 Sincheon-gu, 275-2 Sincheon-gu, and subsequently, the victims paid tobacco to themselves before the victims, and caused the victims to face their head and sckes, respectively, and then the victims were able to look at their head and sckes, respectively, and then the victims were able to face their face.

2. We examine the judgment, and each of the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victims under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the contents of each agreement bound in the trial records, the above victims and their legal representatives may recognize the fact that they have withdrawn their wish to punish the defendant on May 18, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The part of the Juvenile Department sent to the Juvenile Department, excluding the part concerning the dismissal of the above indictment, is the same as the attached facts of crime. As a result of the trial of this case, it is recognized that the defendant is a juvenile provided for in Article 2 of the Juvenile Act, and therefore, it constitutes a protective disposition. Therefore, it is so stated in Article 50 of the same Act