beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, and for eight months, for Defendant C, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants entered into a occupancy management service contract with the head of the management office, G and H dispatched from the Seoul Gangnam-gu apartment complex to the above apartment complex from the F Co., Ltd., and concluded the occupancy management service contract with the purport that the Defendants would settle disputes between the companies that occur in the process of the interior construction for the occupants of the apartment complex, manage and control such disputes, and dispose of wastes generated from the interior construction, etc. instead of disposing of the waste generated from the interior construction.
After that, the Defendants, based on these occupancy management services contracts, neglected the site by posting security guards consisting of employees belonging to BD operated by Defendant A at the entrance of the apartment complex, etc., and attempted to collect money and valuables from the companies including the tegical construction, etc. for their own money and waste disposal expenses.
Defendant
A and Defendant C, around March 16, 2014 in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, put security guards at the apartment complex entrance and put them over to the G account by controlling the access of the damaged company in charge of interior works, etc., at the same time, threatened the damaged company's employees not to be engaged in the business unless they pay money under the pretext of self-sufficiency, etc., and urged the damaged company's employees to frequently patrol each apartment building and to find out the unpaid construction site of the damaged company, and if they did not pay money, they seem to have any danger and injury to the affected company's business activities. In addition, the Defendants jointly used the victim K, the representative of the "J", to receive 300,000 won from the victim K to the G account and take it over to the said account under the name of self-sufficiency of the damaged company.
4. By the end of 14.1, Defendant A had a total of KRW 52,269,000, Defendant B had a total of KRW 31,584,000, and Defendant C had a total of KRW 21,085,00.