Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the 'E' mutually, the main purpose of which is the remodeling of buildings located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D, and the defendant B is the head of the 'E' management office.

On September 1, 2015, the Defendants entered into a contract for the second floor remodeling of the Hlaundry Building in the Haundry House G in the Haak-gun, Jeonnam-gun, Seoul, with the victim F, and the same year.

9.2. From around February 9

9. By the end of 23, the above construction was carried out.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. The Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint attack) committed assault and intimidation against the victim to receive the intermediate payment of KRW 38 million from the victim, who heard the phrase “it is impossible to pay an intermediate payment of KRW 38 million if he does not repair any defect that occurred during the construction process.”

At around 12:40 on September 25, 2015, the Defendants found the said Hlaund, and Defendant A told that the mobile phone cited by Defendant A was collected in the laund of the said laund of the said laund of the said laund of the Child, and that the money stated in the written estimate is called as “induct tax calculation of tax base,” and Defendant B collected the documents against the victim, and Defendant B stated that “I would bring an accusation against the illegal extension of the said building, and file a charge against the Defendant from the workplace of the Party, who is a public official under the jurisdiction of the head of Heung-gun.”

However, the victim refused the Defendants’ demand, stating that “no money may be paid unless the victim repairs defects.”

As a result, the Defendants jointly attempted to receive property by threatening the victim, but eventually, they failed to comply with the victim and subsequently failed to receive the property.

B. On September 25, 2015, from around 12:40 on the same day to 17:40 on the same day, Defendants who interfere with their business continue to speak to the effect that the said victim would change the amount of money. As seen above, the Defendants collected mobile phone devices, collected documents, and parked two vehicles on the entrance and exit of the said laundry, and continued to open and open the said laundry and open the said laundry.