logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.06.26 2014고단577
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as having been sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court on January 28, 2008 by the Defendant for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and having been sentenced to a fine of 5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court on November 6, 2008 by the Daejeon District Court on November 6, 2008.

On May 2, 2014, at around 02:35, the Defendant: (a) driven a car on the front of a restaurant under the mutual influent circumstances, in approximately 70km section, from around the 70km road in the front of the Asan-Eup Asan-si Cro, Asan-si, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.112%, while driving the car.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a car by obtaining a franchise.

On May 2, 2014, at around 02:35, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.112% of alcohol concentration, and driven one lane in front of the eroscop distance in Alsan-Eup in Alsan-si, Alsan-si, at the erosctic library room, at an influorous speed.

At the time, the location is night, and the signal apparatus is installed and traffic control is performed. In such a case, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving of a motor vehicle to live well in the front door, and to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely under the new code.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to enter the vehicle stop signal to the right side of the victim C (the 48-year-old taxi) operated by the victim C (the 48-year-old taxi) in accordance with the new code from the left side of the Defendant’s proceeding.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s occupational negligence, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report, the site photograph of the accident, and the report on the actual condition of the driver;

arrow