The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles) is consistent with the victim's statement, and the credibility is high, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as field CCTV images, acknowledged that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim as stated in the facts charged, the court below acquitted the victim of the facts charged in this case, by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles

2. Determination

A. On December 15, 2017, at around 03:47, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim’s will, by force, against the victim’s will, such as: (a) the victim, who was seated in a croke in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as “the foregoing cromatic defect”; and (b) the victim’s breast part of the chest was knick.

B. The judgment of the court below held that the defendant made a statement that he did not have the intention to commit an indecent act because he attempted to put the victim's left part of the victim's left part in the process of suggesting tin to the victim who was sitting on the side boom at the drinking house, and denied the charges. ② According to CCTV images in which the defendant's contact with the victim was taken by many people, etc., according to the CCTV images in which the defendant's contact with the victim was taken, etc., in order to get the victim who was sitting on the side boom, etc., the defendant made a proposal to move the victim's left part of the victim's chest back to the side boom of the victim one time, and the victim refused to do so, and the defendant tried to use the part of the victim's cell phone to take part above the victim's left part to put the victim's boom, and the defendant did not sell it. ③ The victim's cell phone boom at the time of drinking.