Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 on November 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance with the key of the store located in Busan, Busan, the operator of the store; (b) opened the entrance with the key of the store in which the victim E and the employees of the store left and left any cret; and (c) cut off the entrance with the total of KRW 14,00,000,000, the market price of the victim’s possession, which was kept in the said store. (d) The Defendant: (a) cut off the entrance with 5 mobile phones of Samsung Galth, the total of KRW 14,00,000,000, the market price of which is KRW 14 million.

In addition, the Defendant stolen the stolen mobile phone at around 15:00 on the same day, with one cell phone of 6S mobile phone in the market price of the victim who was stored in the same place while entering the computer data on 15 mobile phones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A copy of the document of application for each short term, the screen of the Kakao Stockholm course and the loan certificate [the defendant and his defense counsel merely bring a mobile phone for openings according to the entrustment contract and did not have an intention to steals;

However, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is acceptable, in full view of the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court: (i) around October 2015, the defendant notified the defendant that E terminated the entrustment contract on the ground that E was exposed to illegal business of law; (ii) the entrustment contract between the victim is still valid; (iii) the defendant appears not to attend the burial of this case from November 1, 2015; and (iv) the defendant brought a cell phone from the point of view that he did not have any other employees; and (v) the defendant brought a cell phone from the point of view that he did not notify the other employees of the fact that he opened the cell phone and brought it to the victim, and thus, the defendant and his defense counsel can be fully convicted of the charge of this case.