Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the plaintiff ordering payment shall be revoked.

The Defendants are jointly and severally.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the automobile E (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) for D Driving.

Defendant B is the driver of the F-motor vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant B-motor vehicle”), and Defendant C is the owner of Defendant B-motor vehicle.

B. On July 18, 2018, around 08:56, the Defendant Lee-wheeled Vehicle crossinging the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was going to the route near the H company located in Seo-gu Daejeon, into the crosswalk, was shocked.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

D was diagnosed as a scopical and copical scopical scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic

On the other hand, I shall pay 168,310 won remaining after paying 1.2 million won of the liability insurance amount corresponding to class 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act to the plaintiff.

E. In addition to D’s medical treatment costs, the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,822,190 consolation money of KRW 150,000, KRW 707,630, and KRW 184,00, and other damages, KRW 780,560, and KRW 853,70, out of KRW 1,06,70 paid for repair costs, according to the decision of the JJ Committee, the Plaintiff was claimed by the I Resolution Committee.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts seen earlier, the instant accident enters the road from the road to the road, and passes over by driving the Plaintiff’s driver’s previous driver’s violation of the duty of care on the road and the two-wheeled vehicle.

The negligence of Defendant B, the driver of the two-wheeled Automobile, who entered the crosswalk, was concurrent.

In addition, as the JJ's decision, delivery is carried out as it is.