1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant B Company 2,828,768, and Defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”). Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant 1”). The Defendant C Federation is a mutual aid insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to F vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

B. At around 11:46 September 17, 2016, Defendant 2 stopped between the first and the second two lanes by avoiding the entry of Defendant 1’s vehicle into the right zone from the right zone to the right zone to the right zone, leading to the two-lanes of Defendant 2’s front side of the vehicle stopped as seen above in the front section of Defendant 2’s front side.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff paid KRW 4,342,080 in total, including KRW 1,773,840, KRW 1,970,150, KRW 598,100, and KRW 2,703,920, KRW 3,039,910, KRW 1,014,760, and KRW 1,673,170, and KRW 1,370,000 as the repair cost of Defendant 2’s vehicle, including the payment of KRW 1,370,00 as the passenger L, M, N’s treatment costs and the amount agreed upon.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 17 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s allegation that the instant accident occurred is likely to run without contact with Defendant 1’s negligence and Defendant 1, who entered the instant lane to the two-lanes, not the three-lanes at the right edge, while entering the right edge from the right edge to the right edge.