1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be the principal lawsuit.

In light of the following circumstances, upon considering the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 7-1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 34 as well as the overall purport of arguments, the plaintiff determined that the sum of the amount calculated by multiplying the weight of a gallon and pipe supplied by the plaintiff at the time when the contract of this case was concluded and the additional order was issued by the plaintiff as the price for the goods under the contract of this case, and the cost of replacing the gallon and pipe, it is reasonable to deem that the price for the goods is KRW 18,350,00 in accordance with the supplied quantity and settlement details among the particulars claimed by the plaintiff after the lawsuit of this case, if the price for the goods is settled according to the quantity and settlement details of the supplied by the plaintiff after the lawsuit of this case, it is insufficient to reverse the above recognition only on the basis of each of the evidence Nos. 15, 17, 22, 23, 25, 26, 29,

The Plaintiff calculated the total value of 1,711,90 4,80 62,870 - 400 - 13,90 - 13,90 - 90 - 13,00 - 13,00 - 40 - 17,027 - 40 - 90 1,027 - 927 - 25 - 25 107 - 107 - 107 - 107 - 107 - 7 0 - 7 0 - 7 0 - 8 - 4 - 7 0 - 7 0 - 7 0 - 6 - 3 0 - 7 0 - 4 0 - 7 0 - 7 0 - 106 - 36 - 4 0 - 7 0 - 7 00 - 5 -7 - 107 -4 -7 -

Details of the calculation of the value of supply for gallons shall be as shown in the attached Form.

gallongal gallon support for a constituent part of creative galgal net framework.