(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고단3256

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.03.23 2015고단3256

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2012, the Defendant was released on December 24, 2013, when he was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment as a crime of fraud in support of Sungnamwon, and was released on December 27, 2014.

1. Fraud entered into a lease contract with the owner E on September 10, 2010 with respect to the fourth floor and fifth floor of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D ground buildings (the lease term of five years, deposit money of KRW 60 million, and rent of KRW 600,000 per month) and entered into a lease contract with the owner E on September 10, 201, but is a Fbudio Telecom, but, on March 23, 2012, due to the overdue rent, management fee, etc., he/she was subject to a lawsuit seeking delivery of the building from E on March 23, 2012.

The conciliation was concluded to the effect that “” was “.

around April 15, 2014, the Defendant paid C and “The Defendant paid C the leased deposit of KRW 245 million to C, and leased the F Studio telecom from C from April 18, 2014 to September 15, 2015.

“At the time of preparing the studio rental agreement with C, the former tenants who entered into a contract with C take over the obligation to return the deposit and the Defendant entered into a contract with C to operate the studio tele.

However, the Defendant did not pay C the leased deposit amount of KRW 245 million according to the contract, and the above adjustment was established between C and E, and the fact that C had already been in arrears with the rent of KRW 15 million at the time of the transfer of his right of lease was known that E had refused to transfer his right of lease, and C had no intention or ability to have the victims normally use the leased room or return the deposit money at the time of termination of the contract, even if C concluded the lease contract with the victims on the leased room for the reason that it did not have any particular property while working for the day after the release.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around April 30, 2014, entered into a lease agreement with the victim G about 511.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2018.08.09 2018고단1530

-서울서부지방법원 2017.07.13 2015고단2763

-서울서부지방법원 2017.07.12 2016고단3951

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.20 2017고정2463

-수원지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고단4433