Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On November 25, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution for fraud, etc. at the Jung-gu District Court on November 25, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2016.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant is a closing member of CJ.

On November 21, 2014, at the end of the end of the end of the end of the end of the end of the meeting, 311 members of the class D, who attended the above end of the end of the meeting, and the voting procedure to newly select the chairman of the end of the meeting whose term expires, F, who is not the chairman of the election management committee, declared ex officio deprivation of the candidate's qualifications for part of the candidates L, Defendant, P, and auditor among the candidates, on the grounds of unfair trade of clan property, poor accounting audit, etc., confusions between the candidates deprived of the candidate's qualifications and some of the members who were deprived of the candidate's status, and the dispute related to the F, who is the chairman of the election management committee, did not proceed with the normal election. Accordingly, F, with only S such as M, which is the remaining candidates, issued the above S 52 list and the above M 51 list, declared that the candidate was newly elected as the president.

Afterwards, some members including the above M and F moved to the "T" restaurant located in Gyeyang-gun AO of Gyeonggi-do and hold a general meeting again, voting and ballot counting, elected the above M M 49 votes, the above S 10 votes A and the above M as the chairperson of the above clans' clans. On the other hand, some members who were in E elected the above B as the chairperson of the newly established election management committee for the Republic of Korea, and elected the defendant as the new chairperson of the above clans' meeting.

Therefore, even if the validity of the act of election of the chairman of the Supreme Court in the above M is different from the validity of the act of election of the chairman of the Supreme Court in the above M, since the defendant was elected in the form of the majority of the members who deprived of the voting rights of the majority of the members in the form of agreement instead of election and voting, the above resolution of the general assembly

1..