logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.24 2016고정1628
자격모용사문서작성등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a closing member of D.

On November 21, 2014, at the Replace of E’s “F,” the 311 members of the said member’s clan were present at the said Replace of E, a member of the said member’s clan and the voting process to be newly selected by the president of the member’s clan whose term expires. As G, the chairman of the election management committee, declared ex officio deprivation of the candidate’s qualification for a part of the candidates for H, I, J, and auditor on the ground of insufficient auditing of clan property transactions, etc., the confusion occurs between the candidates deprived of the candidate’s qualification and some members of the candidates who were deprived of the candidate’s qualification, and the dispute related to the candidate’s senior member’s qualification of the chairman of the election management committee did not run a normal election.

As a result, G conducted a large vote with only the remaining Defendant and K, and declared that K was elected as the new Chairperson with the 52 votes and the 50 votes of Defendant 50 votes.

Afterwards, the majority of all the members, including the defendant and G, moved to the "M" restaurant located in the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun L, and hold a general meeting again, and the defendant was elected as the chairperson of the above large-scale council, and N andO as the auditor.

Some of the members remaining in this Part F elected P as the chairman of the election management committee in which P, and then elected I as the new president of the large-scale council in the agreement conjection method.

Therefore, even though the validity of the act of election of the chairman of the Supreme Court of Korea to K and I is separate from the validity of the act of election of the chairman of the Supreme Court of Korea, since the defendant was elected under the situation of deprivation of the voting rights of the majority of the members of the Supreme Court of Korea by some of the members of the Supreme Court after the act of election of the chairman of the Supreme Court of Korea had already been completed at a place other than

1. The purpose of uttering is to exercise, notwithstanding the absence of qualification or authority as the D Chairperson, the Defendant, who prepares a private document for qualification solicitation;

A. On November 22, 2014, the minutes of the D General Meeting are as follows: “No. 22, 2014.”

arrow