1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion begins with work as a public official of Grade VII in the Jeju Nowon-gu Office from around 1992, and was employed as a public official of Grade VII in charge of the Jeju metropolitan economy and the Energy System. Around May 2008, the Plaintiff submitted an application for reinstatement for reinstatement in order to restore the status of temporary retirement due to a disease caused by official duties. The Plaintiff’s assertion merely submitted the application for voluntary retirement under the name of the Plaintiff to the Jeju general affairs department and personnel department by forging the application for voluntary retirement under the name of the Plaintiff and submitted the application for voluntary retirement to the Plaintiff on April 20, 2012 (hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Defendant’s voluntary retirement disposition that was not based on the Plaintiff’s intent against the Plaintiff on April 20, 2012 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) is significant and apparent

2. There is no evidence to prove that C/D, working in the Jeju Viewing General Department, and the personnel management division, submitted to the Jeju Viewing Department by forging an application document for voluntary retirement in the name of the plaintiff.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and the purport of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as well as the entire pleadings, the fact that the Plaintiff received the retirement pension for more than two years after completing the process of voluntary retirement, and that C and D forged the application documents under the name of the Plaintiff and submitted them to the general affairs department of Jeju viewing and personnel management department, thereby finding the Plaintiff guilty of the crime of false accusation in the criminal case in which the Plaintiff filed a complaint against C and D.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion based on the premise that the application document under the name of the Plaintiff was forged and submitted cannot be accepted without further review.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.