A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court. The judgment became final and conclusive on May 25, 2012. On May 22, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gyeyang Branch Branch of the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 30, 2012, and was released on September 13, 2012 in the Incheon Detention House.

On November 8, 2012, at around 08:40, the Defendant: (a) 1105, the investigation of the Busan High Police Station in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, 1105, and the investigation of the crime of fraud in which he did not pay the drinking value, and (b) was investigated by police officers, such as scambling C, with D; (c) was investigated into the suspicion of fraud in which he did not pay the drinking value; (d) was examined as E; and (e) was examined as E; and (e) was written as “E” in the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the above C, etc.; and (e) marked his own unmanned on the next page.

As a result, the Defendant forged E’s private signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his authority, and around that time, the above police station submitted the protocol of interrogation of a suspect with a forged private signature to the police officers, such as the above C, without knowledge of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused (E);

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, etc. and other inquiry reports (A) and investigation reports (a) and Acts and subordinate statutes to attach judgments, etc. during the period of repeated crimes against A);

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. From the perspective of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime for which the period of punishment under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act has not yet lapsed, among concurrent crimes, and that the Defendant escaped on the sentencing date, sentence of sentence against the Defendant is inevitable.

However, the age, character, character and environment of the defendant, including the fact that the defendant is led to the crime of this case.