logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.18 2014가합11263
손해배상청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a school juristic person that establishes and operates a F University.

Defendant B was appointed as an assistant professor at F University in 1991 and served as a full-time professor in 2002. Defendant C was appointed as an assistant professor at F University in 1990 and served as a full-time professor in 2003. Defendant D was a person who was appointed as a full-time professor at F University in 1996 and served as an associate professor in 2006.

Defendant E is an associate professor who was appointed to the FF University in 1988 and served as an associate professor.

Defendant B, C, and E are joint representatives of the F University Professors Council (hereinafter referred to as the “Professor”) established around March 19, 2013, and Defendant D is a member of the Teaching Council.

B. The Defendants distributed news materials, etc. to the press in the name of the faculty council. The Defendants distributed news materials, etc. including details related to the suspicion of forging the graduate certificate of the president of the F University on ten occasions as shown in the attached Table 1. The key contents are as follows: ① The president of G president obtained admission permission from H University on January 4, 2002, and registered the said university by May 14, 2003, and confirmed that the registration was made again on May 14, 2010. ② The above admission permission was deemed to have been transferred to the National Assembly in 2002. The Defendants were presumed to have been presumed to have been admitted to the National Assembly. ③ The Defendants were known to have been expelled from the Republic of Korea in 203 case due to the lack of success in the university prior thereto, and were registered again in the media in the name of 2010. The Defendants were deemed to have been included in the attached Table 1 to have been distributed in the Presidential Council on Special Cases Concerning Military Service.

(1)

arrow