A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2019 Highest 126" was a person who was divorced on November 29, 2018 by the relationship between the victim B (n, 32 years of age) and the law.

1. Crimes around December 19, 2018 (Intrusion upon residence, special property damage and destruction);

A. On December 19, 2018, the Defendant, who entered a residence, entered the south-gu C apartment with the permission of the resident of the said apartment unit D, entered the apartment unit into the apartment unit, and went out of the apartment unit through beada, and continued to go out of the apartment unit E, which is the victim B’s residence in the lower floor, and opened the window and intrudes on the victim’s residence by entering the room.

B. At around 21:35 on the same day as the above paragraph (a), the Defendant destroyed the kitchen knife of the victim B, which is a dangerous object of the kitchen which had sexual intercourse with other males, with the kitchen knife in which the victim B had sexual intercourse with the other males. In addition, the Defendant destroyed the kitchen knife by 50 tonife, 50 tonife, 200 tonife, 80 tonife, 21:35 tonife.

2. Crimes on or around December 20, 2018 (Intrusion upon residence, interference with business)

A. On December 20, 2018, around 05:05:05, the Defendant, who entered a residence, was in front of the above apartment E, a victim B’s residence, and entered the password, which was known in advance, into an electronic locking device installed in the entrance for the purpose of delivery, and entered the door to the next large bank, thereby infringing on the victim’s residence.

B. In order to find out whether the Defendant continued to reside in the above apartment E, the Defendant had the intention to place an order for delivery food to the above apartment E by falsity.

The Defendant, at around 11:40 on December 20, 2018, in a place where his address is unknown, and the facts are used by the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not reside in the said apartment E, and did not think of food in the restaurant, the Defendant called the G cafeteria operated by the Victim F to “the delivery of fake 2 gress and hot water 1 gress to C apartment E” and subsequently, avoided contact with the victim, thereby engaging in the victim’s restaurant business by deceptive means.