logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.01.07 2014고단4201
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 4201"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving of C Pops.

On May 12, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on the 14:45th of May 2, 2014, and led to a road of 52 lanes in front of the 52-lane new stocks between the former light and the latter to the rooftop.

Since there is a road in which the central line is installed as a hub of one-lane, it has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a person engaged in driving service without driving alcohol in a drunken state, driving after obtaining a driver's license, reducing speed and operating a steering and steering system accurately, and driving safely without harming the central line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and driven without a driver’s license under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.115%, and the Defendant got the left-hand drum of the road due to overcoming the center line, and received the front portion of the vehicle driving freight.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the Gale Day owned by the Reinforcement Military Administration by the above occupational negligence, which is approximately KRW 3.5 million of repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the above time, driving the above cargo vehicle without a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.115% from the 3km section from the 3km section to the 3km section from the snch chill road in the front side of the Incheon Strengthening Military Road to the point of the above accident.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate an automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the freight truck that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as above.

"2014 Highest 8199"

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a C salary-franchising vehicle.

The defendant on November 2014.

arrow