Seoul High Court 2009Nu6003 (Law No. 9, 2009)

Supreme Court Decision 2008Du11068 ( October 12, 2009)

No trade shall be deemed a nominal transaction on the ground that a bombane company was opened in connection with the transaction of gold bullion.

It is difficult to readily conclude that the instant transaction, one of the entire transactions, is not a nominal transaction, on the sole basis of the fact that there is a wide carbon company in the middle stage, etc., which is a day until gold bullion is imported and exported.

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

All of the records of this case and the original judgment and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the argument about the appeal of this case is deemed not to include the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal of Supreme Court or to have no grounds for it. Thus, the appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent