logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.10 2013고단4204
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 12, 2013, around 14:00 on July 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) upon the victim C’s house located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju; and (b) upon the victim’s think of theft of property, the Defendant opened an entrance by using a key that the victim hiddenly opened at the bottom of the chemical located in the front entrance; and (c) invaded the said house into the front entrance; (d) at the same time, the amount of 40,000 won per the face of the metal located on the front entrance of plastics; (e) one iron storage box, one ham, and one ham, which was located on the front page of the said house.

2. On July 21, 2013, around 07:40 on July 21, 2013, the Defendant infringed on the “F” main points operated by the victim E in the Southern-gu, Gwangju, through the main entrance of the bank, which was not corrected by the victim E, for theft of the property, to the restaurant hole, and then stolen the property by holding 2,200 won in that place, 1 of U.S. carbon gas, 1 of the market price, 1 of U.S. carbon gas, and 1 of the market price.

3. On July 29, 2013, at around 17:30 on July 29, 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stolen: (b) committed a theft with a yellow-belt with two of the mobile phones in the city located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju; (c) one cash 10,000 won in the vehicle; (d) two of the victim’s resident registration certificates; and (e) two of the gal-fluties in the city of 90,000 won in each city; and (e) two of the gal-fluties-type mobile phones in the relevant city of Y.

4. On July 2013, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft and attempted larceny of a structure, and (b) took place in the 101st room of “Mlet,” managed by the victim L in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju; (c) opened an entrance by using a key kept in the relevant mail, in the mind that he/she stolen the property, and (d) did not have any mos while following the stolen object, and (d) did not have any mosing and attempted the attack.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each statement of E, C, and I;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each on-site inspection report;

arrow