beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The Defendant does not have driven a freight vehicle at the time and place stated in the facts charged.
The portion claimed by the Defendant F, while driving a cargo vehicle, was destroyed by a person who cannot identify at 8:0 a.m. on the day of the instant case, and reported it to the police box by the victim's scam. However, the victim's scam was reported to the police box. However, the police officer called up at 2 p.m. at 2 p.m., the time of the instant case where the victim's scam did not immediately dispatch, and the Defendant, who was the victim and the scam, was in the
B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (five million won by fine) is too unreasonable.
2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts
A. (1) On July 17, 2015, at least 14:20, the Defendant reported to the police on the following grounds: (i) the instant facts charged; (ii) on the right side side of the road in front of the D cafeteria located in the Gamyang-gun C, the Defendant: (iii) destroyed the Eco-do cargo vehicle run by the Defendant to return home; and (iv) subsequently, the Defendant continued to drive the said cargo at a point where approximately 300 meters away from the accident site of the Defendant’s dwelling, and (v) was driven by the Defendant while driving the vehicle at the stude room room of the Defendant’s dwelling located at the point where the accident occurred.
At around 15:30 on the same day, the Defendant was required by the police officer to comply with the drinking test three minutes after receiving the above F’s report, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving of the Empi while under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, snowing, etc. at the ward in the room in the room in the 208 room where the Defendant was living in Mayang-gun G, and snowing, etc. with the Defendant snicking and snicking the snow with the snow, etc., and on the other hand, he was required by the police officer without justifiable grounds, such as rejection.