1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant, including those resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in Paragraph (2) below; and (b) the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding “the additional judgment of the court of first instance” as stated in Paragraph

2. Parts of correction of the trial;

A. A. The 12th part of the judgment of the first instance is amended to “h” in the 15th part of the judgment, and the 13th part of the judgment of the first instance is amended to “the amount of damage must be deducted or reduced” in the 13th part of the judgment of the first instance, and “the amount of damage must be deducted or reduced, or the amount of the above amount of damage shall be the amount of automatic claim, and the amount of service rendered by the supplementary intervenor against the

B. The part of the first to sixth acts in the judgment of the court of first instance (the first to sixth acts) is modified as follows, and the first to fourth acts in the judgment of the court of first instance are not sufficient grounds.

(b) by striking the section.

According to the purport of the whole testimony and pleading of the evidence Nos. 15, 18-1 through 3, 20-5, 23-21-5, 20-5, 23-57, and 130 of the evidence Nos. 23-57, and the witness E’s testimony and pleading, it is reasonable to deem that the supplementary intervenor performed the services related to the designation of the rearrangement zone, the authorization for establishment, and the authorization for the implementation of the project in accordance with the service contract of this case. The supplementary intervenor performed the services related to the designation of the rearrangement zone, the authorization for establishment, and the authorization for the implementation of the project. The above recognition is insufficient to reverse the above recognition due to each of the evidence No. 2, 5-7, and 9-13

"The following parts shall be inserted between 10th of the first instance judgment and 19th and 20th of the first instance judgment:

According to the instant service contract, the supplementary intervenor vicariously performs the work related to the Defendant’s application for project implementation authorization, Article 2(6) of the Act, and the preparation, appraisal, measurement, and traffic impact assessment of the maintenance zone designated by the supplementary intervenor.