logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.01.23 2017노601
친환경농어업육성및유기식품등의관리ㆍ지원에관한법률위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The court below found the defendant not guilty on the ground of appeal, despite having sold the benefit of agricultural products not certified as agricultural products without agrochemicals. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts.

2. As the court below properly states, according to the results of inquiry, it is difficult to find out the fact that the defendant only can recognize the fact that he/she sold a astronomical benefit that has obtained certification of agricultural products without agricultural chemicals, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is not sufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant sold a astronomical benefit that

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow