logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.20 2016고정774
친환경농어업육성및유기식품등의관리ㆍ지원에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the representative of Gwangju Mine-gu C and 3rd floor D.

No person shall advertise any non-certified product as an authenticated product, or advertise any non-certified product so that it can be mistakenly recognized as an authenticated product, or advertise any product differently from the certified product.

Nevertheless, the Defendant opened an Internet homepage E and sold products with a favorable agricultural product that was not certified as non-agricultural products around January 2016 through the above website, and advertised it as a certified product with a mark of certification of agricultural products without agricultural chemicals.

2. The evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor alone that the defendant did not obtain agricultural product certification from non-agricultural products, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the fact ( rather, according to the result of factual inquiry, it can be acknowledged that the defendant's sales of the defendant had obtained agricultural product certification from non-agricultural products). 3. Accordingly, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow