(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.25 2015가단24952

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.25 2015가단24952

공사대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 19,551,200 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 5, 2015 to January 25, 2017.

Reasons

1. On February 14, 2012, the Plaintiff (contractor) entered into a contract with the Defendant (contractor) for the following terms:

The name of the construction project (A: the name of the plaintiff and the defendant: the location of the new construction project (hereinafter referred to as the "building in this case"): The construction cost of C at the time of the strike: the construction period of KRW 1,595,00,000: the construction period of KRW 1,59: the construction cost of KRW 1,595,000: the defect repair liability period on February 14, 2012 and July 31, 2012: Article 26 (Defect security) of the

2. B shall repair all defects arising from the relevant construction works during the defect repair obligation period prescribed in this contract from the date of completion of the completion inspection.

5. If the defect of the construction works is attributable to the intention of Eul, the defect repair shall be carried out by Eul or the compensation shall be made even after the defect repair period has expired.

Article 34 (Compensation for Damages, etc.)

4. If a loss was incurred to A or a third party due to a breach of contract (such as an insolvent construction) by B after the completion of this project, B shall compensate for the loss.

As of November 2016, 2016, the outer wall of the instant building causes a defect that leaves part of the drum (hereinafter “instant defect”).

Since the dyke of the building outer wall of this case is confirmed to have constructed a string, rather than to have built a string in the main dyke, after the completion of the structural frame of the outer wall, it is not necessary to determine the building of a syke and the syke condition at the time of the installation of a syke, and it is not necessary to determine the syke of the syke, but to determine the flow flow from the outer wall at the time of the installation of a syke, but it is deemed to have excellent flown through the syke part of the external stairs room and the syke part generated from the syke part of the external

The attachment of the net container, which is constructed on the dr.e. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. d. e. d. d. d. d

참조조문

-건설산업기본법

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2018.08.30 2017가합20511

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.07.23 2014고단487

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.23 2018가단5127326

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.01.11 2016가합2357

-서울남부지방법원 2020.06.12 2019가단237313