1. The lawsuit of this case is dismissed in exchange for another court.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the following matters. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420

(A) Although the Plaintiff changed the attached draft of the judgment of the first instance to the annexed draft of this judgment, the Plaintiff’s ground for appeal is not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is presented to this court, it is recognized that the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court are legitimate). The “2016Guhap50693” of the judgment of the first instance is deemed to be “2016Guhap50639,” which is “2016Guhap50639,” which is “the grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff.”

5 pages 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be 8 in the form of “the indication of the attached drawing(s), letter, winter, and female” as “the indication(s), (f), and (e) of the attached drawing(s).”

2. The conclusion is that the lawsuit of this case, which was changed in exchange at this court, is unlawful and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.

(The judgment of the court of first instance was invalidated due to the exchange change of the lawsuit filed in this court).