The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (one year of suspended sentence in four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a police officer in need of fair enforcement of the law. In particular, there are unfavorable circumstances such as the disclosure of information learned while working as the head of the criminal investigation team directed at a day, and the fairness and trust in the law enforcement of police officers due to the defendant's act. However, the defendant's confession of the crime in this case and the defendant committed the crime in this case for the purpose of hindering investigation, or does not appear to have received money and valuables in relation to the crime in this case. The defendant did not have any record of criminal punishment before the crime in this case. The defendant had no record of criminal punishment before the crime in this case, and performed his duties faithfully as a police officer for about 25 years. In light of the defendant's attitude, the defendant had already been subject to heavy disciplinary action one-month suspension due to the crime in this case. In light of the contents and the result of the crime in this case, it seems that the defendant loses his status when considering the contents of the crime in this case and its consequences, it seems that it would be harsh that the defendant lose his status in light of the contents of the crime in this case.

3. Accordingly, the part of the judgment below against the defendant in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act is reversed, and the following is again decided after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged against the defendant recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below. Thus, it is all true in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.