1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On March 16, 2009, the deceased B (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) entered and worked in White Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “White Co., Ltd.”) on May 29, 2013, when he was in office, he was deprived of consciousness by being occupied in a restaurant on May 29, 2013.

The Deceased was found by workplace rent and sent back to C Hospital by the 119 Emergency Squads, but died on May 29, 2013.

For the deceased’s death diagnosis report, the private person of the deceased is written as “unexit,” and on June 10, 2013, the autopsy report of the National Science Investigation Institute stated that the private person of the deceased is likely to be a acute funeral due to the heart’s disease.

The Plaintiff asserted that, as the spouse of the deceased, the deceased died through occupational and stress, and filed a claim for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses with the Defendant. However, on October 2, 2013, the Defendant issued a disposition of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation between the deceased’s work and death on the grounds that it is difficult to recognize the proximate causal relation between the deceased’s death.

The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination of the above decision with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for reexamination on January 17, 2014.

[Based on recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Gap evidence Nos. 7-1 and 2, and the purport of the entire argument of this case is legitimate. The plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case is legitimate due to overtime work, etc. The plaintiff's allegation was excessive work, etc., and the physical rhythm was flow due to the night shift work, and the harmful substances were exposed to the characteristics of the

The Deceased was suffering from the disease of “the astronomical mal marm of the malmar board and malmar board.” However, all of the above circumstances should be deemed to have aggravated the disease of the Deceased’s existing disease beyond nature and caused the death of the Deceased.

Nevertheless, the defendant shall perform his duties.