logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.02.13 2014노3502
업무방해등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, community service, 120 hours of imprisonment) is too unfasible.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant repeatedly committed a crime of interference with the performance of duties against many victims, obstructing the performance of official duties by exercising force against police officers dispatched by the defendant due to the crime of interference with duties or non-compliance with evictions, and that there is no agreement with the victims of the crime of interference with duties or non-compliance with evictions, etc., the defendant should be strictly punished. However, the defendant did not appeal against the judgment of conviction of the court below, and the defendant did not appeal against the judgment of conviction of the court below, and the defendant violated the wrong judgment of the court of the court of the first instance, the defendant was only punished, and the defendant submitted a written application to the court of the court of the court of the court of the court below that the police officer who suffered interference with the performance of official duties submitted the defendant to the court of the court of the court of the court of the court, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for the arguments and the records of this case, such as the defendant's character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, relationship

Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow