The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (4 months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in full view of all the circumstances that form the conditions for the arguments and the records of the judgment of the court below, including the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is in a profound radius, that only the defendant has the criminal history of fine, that the defendant has yet to age, that part of the defendant has been seized and returned to the victims. However, there are many favorable circumstances, such as victim L, M, N, Q and Q have the criminal history of the same kind, that the defendant has committed the crime repeatedly over 12 times in the same manner, that there was no agreement with the victims, that there was no change in special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, that there was no change in the character and conduct of the defendant, environment, relationship with victims, motive and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is apparent that the victim’s “U” No. 12 of [Attachment 12] of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error of K, it shall be corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on