beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The defendant 1,371,360,000 won against the plaintiff A and 434,565.
Reasons
The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part of the court of first instance which was used by the following second appeal, and therefore, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part which was used by the court of first instance was all dismissed "Nos. 14 and 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance" as "Nos. 28, 194. 30. 30. 1994."
2-2-2
(a) The portion of “the plaintiff’s assertion” (from Nos. 6, to 10, 12) shall be followed as follows:
A. Since the plaintiffs and their parents suffered mental distress due to each of the tort committed against the plaintiffs on the part of the defendant's assertion, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages of KRW 2,138,026,66 (i.e., KRW 100,00,000,000, KRW 466,666,666 each inheritance amount of consolation money of KRW 428,640,00), and KRW 1,301,232,266 (i.e., KRW 20,00,000, KRW 46,666,6666, KRW 165,434,40) due to the plaintiff's tort committed against the plaintiff Eul by the plaintiff Eul (i.e., KRW 200,000,000,000, KRW 1,301,232,666).
(a) “Determinations on the cause of the claim” (from Nos. 6 to 17 to 8) shall be made as follows:
(1) According to the above facts, according to Article 1 of the former Armed Forces Ordinance (amended by Presidential Decree No. 9734 of Jan. 23, 1980), a security investigator belonging to the military company takes charge of matters concerning military security and military intelligence and the investigation of crimes under Article 44 subparag. 2 of the Military Court Ordinance, and Article 44 of the former Military Court Ordinance (amended by Presidential Decree No. 3444 of Apr. 17, 1981) stipulates that a security unit officer shall investigate a case under the jurisdiction of the Military Court Act, although he/she has no right to investigate.