logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.27 2015누43621
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's judgment citing the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the first instance court, except for partial contents of the judgment as follows. Therefore, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added between five pages and 4,5 below:

【In light of the fact that the deceased voluntarily suspends the study of a private teaching institute due to the side effects of drugs from the two months prior to the occurrence of the accident, the cause of aggravation of disease is the recurrence of symptoms after the medication is interrupted, and the side effects of drugs and their side effects and the side effects of daily life and the side effects of learning disorder caused by the medication are considered to have become the motive for the suspension of medication. The following shall be added to the following two pages.

【The Deceased, from September 2008, caused the relevant accident, damage, apprehensions, and superficial symptoms. From April 2009 to April 4, 2009, she was hospitalized in the Korea National University Cancer Hospital Protection Service (U.S.) on June 4, 2009 due to the deepening of the exchange, relevant circumstances, damage, etc. In addition, “the results of inquiry into the head of the Korea National University Cancer Hospital (U.S.)” was added to the grounds for recognition of the 3rd and 4th conduct.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable.

The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

arrow