beta
Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On September 30, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract between September 30, 2005 and the Defendant, setting the insurance period from September 30, 2005 to September 30, 205, with the Plaintiff as the insured, and the Non-Distribution Diplomatic Uniforms Policy (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”). The contents related to the instant insurance contract are as shown in the attached Table.
B. At around 02:00 on March 10, 2009, the Plaintiff suffered an accident of collision with a vehicle working on a road (hereinafter “instant accident”) while driving one lane on the three-lanes of the Seocho-gu Seoul Common Highway. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered an injury, such as the left fluoral fluoral fluor, the right fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, the right fluoral fluor, etc.
C. On April 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a obstacle to both slots and reduction of the need not be paid on the basis of this, and accordingly, 50% [10% (where there is a serious obstacle to the function of Section 1 among Section 1 in the 3rd sections of a bridge due to the grout of the 13.02m eastline): 10% (where there is a serious obstacle to the function of Section 1 in the 1st part of the 3rd sections of a bridge due to the grout of the 11.9m e.g. in the grout of the 11.9m e., if there is a serious obstacle to the function of Section 1 in the grout of the bridge): 30% (where one bridge is less than 5 cm: when one bridge is shorter than 5 m) of the disability payment rate after the completion of the above diagnosis on October 15, 2010, the Defendant recognized the payment rate of disability in addition to the above 200% of the disability payment rate after the above.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, Eul 1-1, Eul 2-1, Eul 2-1, 2-2, Eul 3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion as to the existence and scope of insurance money payment obligation (1).