Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from January 2013, 2013, tried to prepare compensation, living expenses, etc. with loans or profits from mobile phone opening using the name of the victim C (a person with mental disability 6) who had no special occupation or economic activity.

1. Fraudulentation of loans;

A. On October 11, 2013, the defrauded of a loan for the repayment of agreed gold is the victim’s “The head of the convenience store that had worked as an employee in Korea shall be granted KRW 3 million under the pretext of an agreement related to embezzlement to the head of the convenience store, who has worked as an employee in Korea,” and the amount of the loan and interest shall be repaid on the face of the loan with the four names.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, as the Defendant did not have any fixed monthly income, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the loan instead of the loan even if he received the loan under the name of the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above and obtaining the consent of the victim to the loan application in the name of the victim, received a copy of the resident registration certificate, a copy of the resident registration certificate, and a certificate of high school graduation from the victim, and submitted it to the Hyundai Savings Bank and received the loan amounting to KRW 4 million from the account in the name of the victim who he/she managed.

[A public prosecutor stated that although the Defendant did not pay installment savings, “the termination of the installment savings would incur a loss to the interest,” it constitutes a fraudulent act, such as accepting a loan and requesting a loan. However, this part is denied by the Defendant, and there is no evidence that it is difficult for the Defendant to believe that the part corresponding thereto is in the victim’s statement, and thus, it can be deleted from the facts charged, and it is possible to acknowledge the Defendant as guilty solely on the remaining facts.