logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014. 02. 11. 선고 2013가소115684 판결
원고는 압류선착주의에 따라 피고에게 우선권을 가짐.[국패]
Title

The plaintiff has priority over the defendant according to the principle of attachment priority.

Summary

As the seizure of the plaintiff is registered earlier than the seizure of the defendant and the seizure first priority is applied, it seems that the plaintiff's claim takes precedence over the defendant's claim.

Related statutes

Article 101 of the Framework Act on Local Taxes

Cases

Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Gaz. 115684

Plaintiff

Boan City

Defendant

Korea

Conclusion of Pleadings

on 14, 2010

Imposition of Judgment

oly 11, 2014

Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 17,443,739 won with 5% interest per annum from February 3, 2012 to September 9, 2013, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3. Paragraph 1 can be provisionally executed.

Purport of claim

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

* The ruling of small-sum case may choose not to state the reasons in accordance with Article 11-2(3) of the Trial of Small Claims Act.

arrow