logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.09.09 2015가단6529
소유권이전청구권가등기말소 등
Text

1. Defendant B:

A. Regarding the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, Gwangju District Court Maritime Affairs Office.

Reasons

1. As to the real estate listed in the separate list No. 1 owned by Defendant B, the Gwangju District Court of Gwangju, the Maritime Affairs Office of Maritime Affairs, No. 28372, Dec. 29, 198, received as of Dec. 28, 1988, the provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer based on the reservation for sale and purchase as of Dec. 28, 1988, as of the real estate listed in paragraph 2 of the same list D, the provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer based on the promise as of March 31, 1989, No. 6152, Mar. 30, 1989, the provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer based on the promise as of March 30, 198, the provisional registration of the real estate listed in paragraph 3 of the same list No. 1 owned by E (hereinafter referred to as the "real estate of this case"), and the provisional registration of the Plaintiff No. 1, 28371, as of this case, can be recognized as the provisional registration of this case No.

2. The right to make the other party to the transaction effective by expressing his/her intention to complete the sale and purchase in the unilateral promise as stipulated in Article 564 of the Civil Act, shall be extinguished upon the lapse of the exclusion period, even where the other party to the transaction has delivered the real estate, which is the object of the promise, within a certain kind of formation right, if the exercise period has been agreed between the parties, and within 10 years from the establishment of the promise if there is no such an agreement, and within the said period, if the above period has elapsed, the right to complete the reservation shall be extinguished upon the lapse of the exclusion period (see Supreme Court Decision 91Da44766, Jul. 28, 192). According to the above findings, according to the above facts, the defendant B’s instant right

arrow