beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
"2015 Gohap 384"
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. The Defendant served as the F leader of the Navy headquarters from May 12, 2009 to November 5, 2009, and approved various agenda items related to the test and evaluation of naval vessels and general weapons systems introduced by the Navy in charge of the F F branches (hereinafter “F branches”), which is the department within the G branches, and directed and supervises the work of the G branches, such as ordering H to the direction and direction of the work. On December 31, 2013, the Defendant was discharged from military service as I on December 31, 2013.
H From December 3, 2007 to December 22, 2009, while serving as the Director, the F-General took overall charge of test and evaluation of naval vessels and general weapons systems, and discharged from military court on December 31, 201.
From January 2009 to December 2, 2009, K L team of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration conducted a procedure for purchasing government-funded L team of the hull fixed search engine to be loaded in M (M (hereinafter “N”) through a general competitive bid. In the process, the Navy F G was entrusted by the Defense Acquisition Program Bureau (hereinafter “O”) selected as the equipment subject to the test and evaluation of the body body body body and static and static search engine of the P company (hereinafter “P”) selected as the object of the test and evaluation on July 2009 and as the object of the test and evaluation.
During the process of formulating a test and evaluation plan for the body and static Posinger of the instant vessel as of August 2009 by the Staff member of the Navy F, G head of the Navy served as the Director of the R from January 2008 to September 2009 as the person in charge of test and evaluation, and S head of the R division from January 2008 to September 2009. After reviewing the proposal for the search for the body and static Posinger of the instant vessel sent from the L Team of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, it is difficult to determine the proposal of the G head as “requirements’s proposal for the operation performance (ROC) and the military suitability items, and Q is not submitted a test document to prove the performance, and Q is the Equipment Performance of the Equipment Act.