Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2018, the Defendant: (a) removed a list of mother and child prices equivalent to KRW 15,990 at the market price of 15,90,000 from a manager of the “D” store located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) removed the list of mother and child prices equivalent to KRW 1,190 at the market price; (c) removed the list of 15,90,000 at the market price; and (d) stolen 1 C and 2,990,000,000 won at the market price.

On March 11, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Highest 1057,” committed a theft by bringing one bicycle set of the amount equivalent to KRW 600,000,00,00 in the market price of which the victim H parked at the bicycle gate located in the front of G in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, G with locks.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 765"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A receipt of damaged articles or a photograph of damaged articles 2018 Mano 1057 Mano;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement (the defendant and his defense counsel had a state of mental and physical weakness due to the infertility, etc. of the defendant;

The argument is asserted.

According to the records, although the defendant is deemed to be a person with a disability of class 4 in brain war, there was a lack of ability for the defendant to discern things or make decisions in light of the method of crime, conduct before and after the crime.

It is difficult to see it.

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution has several historys of history of being sentenced to fines by thief, but the attitude of recognizing and reflecting the

The damage was recovered to the victim E, the payment of the agreed amount was made to the victim H, and the conclusion of the agreement with H is not good.