Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2015, at around 12:54, the Defendant intruded with the open entrance of the D office located in Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, the Defendant stolen it with property equivalent to KRW 106,100, totaled of KRW 106,100, and KRW 106,100, and KRW 106, and KRW 100,000, the value of which was KRW 2A,5,000, and KRW 3,000,000.

2. The Defendant: (a) laid off the entrance door of the “F” office, which is a shop adjacent to the same building as the above “A” at the same time and at the same time, the damaged party laid down the key of the vehicle key amounting to KRW 30,000, the market price owned by the injured party G (47 cm) with one another within the office without a mental disorder.

3. On August 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) extracted and stolen the key amounting to KRW 30,000 at the market price displayed at a key located in a kiki, Katok Haak-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, the Defendant, who was placed in the victim J (46 Doz) in front of the first street located in the Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Gyeongcheon-gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, G and J preparation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although there are some unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant in the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has a history of having been sentenced to the suspension of indictment for the same kind of crime, the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment except for the suspension of indictment once, most of the damaged items were returned, and the defendant seems to be not healthy due to the mental disorder 3 now, the guardian's intent to protect the defendant is very strong, and other reasons.